Our approach
How we read the evidence.
Clear explanations need context. Here is what to look for alongside an interesting result.
Start with the actual source
An article should link to the publication it discusses. Check that the title, authors, date, and identifier match. A working link alone does not mean it is the right paper.
Separate the study settings
Cell experiments, animal research, observational studies, and controlled trials answer different questions. We identify these settings rather than treating every citation as equivalent evidence.
Keep the finding and the limitation together
Ask what was measured, who or what was studied, and how long the work lasted. A finding about one formulation or a combination of ingredients cannot simply be assigned to every product sharing a name.
Make uncertainty readable
Short summaries are an entry point, not a replacement for methods and limitations. We retain links to sources and distinguish reference information from personal medical decisions.
Corrections are part of the work
If a source does not support a claim, the claim needs correction or removal. Our public corrections page records material changes. Report a problem to corrections@peptidoteca.com.